27:I[56264,["/_next/static/chunks/3fntmmi971322.js","/_next/static/chunks/1ymt1shyhmu-4.js","/_next/static/chunks/291ciwmgtp_xc.js","/_next/static/chunks/2owa30hnifmhr.js","/_next/static/chunks/2tie5rqwdsi89.js","/_next/static/chunks/2dnipz2c0692b.js","/_next/static/chunks/1mf5iq195c2sn.js","/_next/static/chunks/03wn0-bzh3abk.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_02m0ghanddv.js"],"GuestHistoryRecorder"] 28:I[3004,["/_next/static/chunks/3fntmmi971322.js","/_next/static/chunks/1ymt1shyhmu-4.js","/_next/static/chunks/291ciwmgtp_xc.js","/_next/static/chunks/2owa30hnifmhr.js","/_next/static/chunks/2tie5rqwdsi89.js","/_next/static/chunks/2dnipz2c0692b.js","/_next/static/chunks/1mf5iq195c2sn.js","/_next/static/chunks/03wn0-bzh3abk.js","/_next/static/chunks/0_02m0ghanddv.js"],"EmailPreview"] 2b:I[27201,["/_next/static/chunks/3fntmmi971322.js","/_next/static/chunks/1ymt1shyhmu-4.js","/_next/static/chunks/291ciwmgtp_xc.js","/_next/static/chunks/2owa30hnifmhr.js"],"IconMark"] 29:T13fb2,

Can't see this email? Open in your browser

The Enhanced Newsletter

(5 things that’ll enhance your life that you didn’t know yesterday)

Hi there,

This is our 104th edition of the Enhanced Newsletter! That’s two whole years of creating these, sending them, and you reading them. Whether you’ve been along for the ride from the start, or you’re a more recent subscriber, I really want to say thank you. It’s amazing part of my job getting to put these together, and I really appreciate all the feedback.

​

I’ve changed the way I put these together a ton of times over the last few years - but it’s always fluid and, since you’re the reader, I want to make sure they’re always interesting. If you ever want to see more/less/different stuff, just reply here, let me know, and I’ll keep doing my best to make it exactly right!

​

Okay, anniversary celebrations over, today we'll cover:

A weight-loss drug that might be doing something much bigger than weight loss
The hidden bias your AI hiring tool may be inventing on its own
The 30-second habit that predicts whether a relationship lasts
The daily drink habit tied to 2.5x the risk of a specific cancer
The first Barbour jacket that's actually waterproof, not just water-resistant

Enhanced Longevity: The Weight-Loss Drug That Might Be Doing More Than Weight Loss

Ozempic and Wegovy have a reputation for melting off pounds. New research out of UC Berkeley suggests the active ingredient might be doing something more interesting underneath that: quietly slowing aging itself.

Researchers led by Danica Chen, publishing in Nature, gave semaglutide - the GLP-1 drug behind both brands to 20-month-old female mice, which is roughly the mouse equivalent of late-middle-age. Over three to five months of treatment, the mice showed better spatial memory and exploratory behavior, stronger muscle function, tighter blood sugar control, less inflammation, and a better capacity to repair tissue. In a separate cohort followed to natural death, semaglutide extended median lifespan by nearly 100 days - a meaningful bump for an animal that typically lives two to three years.

Enhanced Longevity: The Weight-Loss Drug That Might Be Doing More Than Weight Loss

Here's the part that makes this more than "Ozempic is healthy, we get it": the researchers ran a head-to-head comparison against a classic 24%-calorie-restricted diet, one of the most well-established longevity interventions there is. The calorie-restricted mice showed the metabolic slowdown you'd expect from an animal in survival mode. The semaglutide mice didn't, their metabolic rate stayed stable while they still got the anti-aging benefits. That's a sign the drug isn't just mimicking starvation biology, it's doing something at least partly distinct.

The caveat is a big one, and the researchers say it plainly: this is mice, not humans, and it "does not show that Ozempic, Wegovy, or other GLP-1 drugs can extend human lifespan." Nobody has run the human trial that would prove this translates, and there's a real difference between a healthy 20-month-old mouse and a human using these drugs for weight loss or diabetes.

Practical takeaway: this isn't a reason to go get a prescription for anti-aging purposes, the human evidence isn't there, and these drugs carry real costs and side effects of their own. But if you're already on a GLP-1 for metabolic reasons, it's a legitimate reason for optimism that the drug may be doing more good than the number on the scale suggests. Worth watching where the human research goes next.

Sources:

Enhanced Tech: The Hidden Bias Your AI Hiring Tool May Be Inventing on Its Own

If your company uses AI to screen résumés or run first-round interviews, here's an uncomfortable new finding: the model might not just be repeating biases baked into its training data. It might be building brand-new ones on the job, in real time, based on nothing but what happens to go wrong once.

Researchers from Princeton and the University of Chicago adapted a classic psychology experiment into a simulated hiring game. Several leading language models including OpenAI's o3 and DeepSeek's R1 screened fictional candidates from four made-up ethnic groups across 20 job types over 40 rounds. Every group performed equally well on the job, but the models weren't told that going in. Humans playing the same game scored 0.84 on a standard segregation scale. The AI models averaged about 65% higher than that. o3, the most "advanced" reasoning model in the test, scored 1.83 close to the maximum possible.

The mechanism is the unsettling part. When a single fictional candidate from one group happened to fail as a doctor, the model didn't just note that one result, it started steering future candidates from that same group toward lower-status jobs, like janitor. That's a bias forming live, from a handful of data points inside the interaction, not something inherited from the training set. It's a genuinely different failure mode than "the AI learned society's biases from the internet," and one that's much harder to audit for, because it isn't sitting in the model's weights waiting to be found, it forms fresh, in the deployment, based on whatever happens to occur.

The limitation worth flagging: this was a clean simulated game with instant, unambiguous feedback. Real hiring feedback is slow, messy, and incomplete, so it's genuinely unclear how strongly this transfers to an actual applicant tracking system. But the researchers did find real fixes: bias dropped substantially when the model was given an explicit incentive structure that rewarded diverse outcomes, and when candidates came with more individual context instead of a bare pass/fail history.

Practical takeaway: if AI touches your hiring process anywhere: screening, ranking, first-round questions - don't assume "we didn't feed it biased data" means you're in the clear. Ask your vendor what safeguards exist against bias that forms during use, not just bias baked in at training, and favor tools that give the model rich context on individual candidates rather than thin, outcome-only signals.

Sources:

MIT Technology Review - AI is more likely than humans to form biases when hiring

Enhanced Relationships: The 30-Second Habit That Predicts Whether a Relationship Lasts

Happy couples aren't necessarily the ones who fight the least. New research suggests they might just be better at pausing to notice when something good is happening.

Researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign surveyed 589 U.S. adults mostly married, average age around 39 about a habit they call "joint savoring": deliberately pausing to appreciate a good moment together instead of letting it slide by. That can be as small as lingering over a good meal, reminiscing about a favorite trip, or actively looking forward to something you have planned. Using a scale adapted from established psychology research, the team found that people who reported more joint savoring with their partner also reported less conflict, more relationship satisfaction, and more confidence the relationship would last. The protective effect showed up most strongly for couples who were also dealing with higher stress in their lives exactly the couples who'd benefit most from a resilience boost.

Worth being honest about the limits here: this only surveyed one partner per couple, not both, so it's one person's perception of the relationship, not a verified shared reality. The sample also skewed toward people already reporting solid relationships and relatively low stress, and toward a fairly narrow demographic (mostly white, married, middle-to-upper income). And like most relationship research, this is correlational, it can't rule out that happier couples simply savor more because they're already happier, rather than the savoring causing the happiness.

Even with those caveats, it lines up with something relationship researchers keep finding from different angles: the small, repeatable rituals couples build around good moments seem to matter as much as how they handle bad ones. It costs nothing, takes seconds, and doesn't require either partner to change anything structural about the relationship.

Practical takeaway: next time something good happens with your partner - a good dinner, an easy afternoon, good news - say something out loud that marks it as a moment worth remembering, instead of just moving on to the next thing. It's a small habit with a real, replicated payoff.

Sources:

Enhanced Nutrition: The Daily Drink Habit Tied to 2.5x the Risk of Stomach Cancer

About 65% of U.S. adults have a sugar-sweetened drink every day without thinking much about it. A new study out of Mass General Brigham gives that habit a specific number worth knowing.

Researchers pooled data from 112,284 people across two of the longest-running health studies in the country: the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, tracking their diets and health outcomes for decades. Over that time, 278 participants developed gastric (stomach) cancer. People who drank a sugar-sweetened beverage daily had roughly 2.45 times the risk of gastric cancer compared to people who drank one less than once a month. Among women specifically, drinking more than one sugary beverage a day pushed that to a 3.04-fold higher risk. Notably, artificially sweetened diet drinks showed no similar association at all, this appears to be specifically about the sugar, not just "soda" as a category.

Enhanced Nutrition: The Daily Drink Habit Tied to 2.5x the Risk of Stomach Cancer

The study can't fully explain why, and it comes with real limitations. It's observational, so it can't prove the sugar itself is the cause rather than something correlated with heavy soda drinking. The researchers also only had H. pylori infection status - a major known risk factor for stomach cancer for a small subset of participants (940 people, about a third of whom were infected), which leaves room for that variable to be muddying the picture. The study population also skewed heavily white, so it's unclear how well this generalizes across other populations.

​

Still, a nearly two-and-a-half-times relative risk from a single, specific, swappable habit is a strong enough signal to take seriously, especially given how cheap the fix is.

Practical takeaway: if a daily soda or sweet tea is part of your routine, this is a good nudge to make it the exception rather than the default swap toward water, unsweetened, or an artificially sweetened version most days. It's one of the few cancer-risk conversations where the fix costs nothing and requires no willpower marathon, just a different can.

​

Sources:

Enhanced Gear: The First Barbour Jacket That's Actually Waterproof

Every Barbour jacket ever made has carried the same small asterisk: waxed cotton is water-resistant, not waterproof. It sheds light rain beautifully and looks better every year it does it but stands in a real, sustained downpour long enough and it eventually loses. The brand's new Transport Ursula is the first one built to not lose that fight at all.

Instead of wax, the Ursula uses a genuine cotton-and-membrane build: a 100% cotton face fabric layered over a polyurethane membrane, with a 100% polyamide lining and a packable polyamide hood. That membrane is the actual engineering story, it's the same basic principle brands like Gore-Tex have used for decades to make something genuinely water-sealed rather than merely water-repellent, and it's new territory for a brand whose entire identity has been built around wax. The jacket keeps a few classically Barbour touches - a stand collar, lower bellows pockets, an angled chest pocket, a quiet checked pattern with minimal branding but the waterproofing itself is a completely different piece of engineering than what's under the hood of a classic Beaufort or Bedale.

At $650, it's priced like the specialty piece it is, and it currently ships final sale, no returns, worth knowing before you order a size you're unsure about. But the honest comparison isn't to a $150 rain shell, it's to the $400-$700 range of technical outdoor jackets that actually perform in sustained wet weather, a category classic wax cotton was never built to compete in.

Practical takeaway: next time you're jacket shopping and the word "waterproof" is on the label, look for the word "membrane" in the spec sheet before you believe it. A wax coating or a "water-repellent" treatment sheds a shower; a real membrane is what actually keeps you dry in a genuine storm and now, for the first time, Barbour makes one.

Sources:

Uncrate - Barbour Transport Ursula Waterproof Jacket

Anyway! That's all for this week. See you next week for more life-enhancing TL;DRs from across the internet.

P.S. New Street Fighter movie coming soon! Is it going to win any Oscars? Unlikely. Does it look like a riot of good fun. 100%.

P.P.S. Know someone who'd like this? Forward it along - sign up here.

Did someone forward you this email? You can sign-up here.

Bored of hearing from me? No problem. You can unsubscribe from the Enhanced Newsletter here.

This email was sent to theenhancedmale@mailspo.com by The Enhanced Male
5126 Clareton Dr Suite 120 Agoura Hills, CA 91301

You received this email because you're part of The Enhanced Male crew. We love sharing updates but if it’s not agreeing with your inbox Unsubscribe here.

2a:T3e06,Can't see this email? [Open in your browser](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/web-view?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a6671c4d9968b0e&se=theenhancedmale%40mailspo.com&m=01M2MPXC8DG3E81TB55SQRDG7H&r=01M2PJA9G2YPZ83P8G80WK0VEW) The Enhanced Newsletter (5 things that’ll enhance your life that you didn’t know yesterday) Hi there, This is our 104th edition of the Enhanced Newsletter! That’s two whole years of creating these, sending them, and you reading them. Whether you’ve been along for the ride from the start, or you’re a more recent subscriber, I really want to say thank you. It’s amazing part of my job getting to put these together, and I really appreciate all the feedback.I’ve changed the way I put these together a ton of times over the last few years - but it’s always fluid and, since you’re the reader, I want to make sure they’re always interesting. If you ever want to see more/less/different stuff, just reply here, let me know, and I’ll keep doing my best to make it exactly right!Okay, anniversary celebrations over, today we'll cover: - A weight-loss drug that might be doing something much bigger than weight loss - The hidden bias your AI hiring tool may be inventing on its own - The 30-second habit that predicts whether a relationship lasts - The daily drink habit tied to 2.5x the risk of a specific cancer - The first Barbour jacket that's actually waterproof, not just water-resistant Enhanced Longevity: The Weight-Loss Drug That Might Be Doing More Than Weight Loss Ozempic and Wegovy have a reputation for melting off pounds. New research out of UC Berkeley suggests the active ingredient might be doing something more interesting underneath that: quietly slowing aging itself. [Researchers led by Danica Chen](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/09/260911214238.htm), publishing in Nature, gave semaglutide - the GLP-1 drug behind both brands to 20-month-old female mice, which is roughly the mouse equivalent of late-middle-age. Over three to five months of treatment, the mice showed better spatial memory and exploratory behavior, stronger muscle function, tighter blood sugar control, less inflammation, and a better capacity to repair tissue. In a separate cohort followed to natural death, semaglutide extended median lifespan by nearly 100 days - a meaningful bump for an animal that typically lives two to three years. [Enhanced Longevity: The Weight-Loss Drug That Might Be Doing More Than Weight Loss] Here's the part that makes this more than "Ozempic is healthy, we get it": the researchers ran a head-to-head comparison against a classic 24%-calorie-restricted diet, one of the most well-established longevity interventions there is. The calorie-restricted mice showed the metabolic slowdown you'd expect from an animal in survival mode. The semaglutide mice didn't, their metabolic rate stayed stable while they still got the anti-aging benefits. That's a sign the drug isn't just mimicking starvation biology, it's doing something at least partly distinct. The caveat is a big one, and the researchers say it plainly: this is mice, not humans, and it "does not show that Ozempic, Wegovy, or other GLP-1 drugs can extend human lifespan." Nobody has run the human trial that would prove this translates, and there's a real difference between a healthy 20-month-old mouse and a human using these drugs for weight loss or diabetes. Practical takeaway: this isn't a reason to go get a prescription for anti-aging purposes, the human evidence isn't there, and these drugs carry real costs and side effects of their own. But if you're already on a GLP-1 for metabolic reasons, it's a legitimate reason for optimism that the drug may be doing more good than the number on the scale suggests. Worth watching where the human research goes next. Sources: - [ScienceDaily - Ozempic-like drug helps mice live longer, stay sharper](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/09/260911214238.htm) - [Nature, 2026; 657(8131): 469, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10940-7](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10940-7) Enhanced Tech: The Hidden Bias Your AI Hiring Tool May Be Inventing on Its Own If your company uses AI to screen résumés or run first-round interviews, here's an uncomfortable new finding: the model might not just be repeating biases baked into its training data. It might be building brand-new ones on the job, in real time, based on nothing but what happens to go wrong once. [Enhanced Tech: The Hidden Bias Your AI Hiring Tool May Be Inventing on Its Own] Researchers from Princeton and the University of Chicago adapted a classic psychology experiment into a simulated hiring game. Several leading language models including OpenAI's o3 and DeepSeek's R1 screened fictional candidates from four made-up ethnic groups across 20 job types over 40 rounds. Every group performed equally well on the job, but the models weren't told that going in. Humans playing the same game scored 0.84 on a standard segregation scale. The AI models averaged about 65% higher than that. o3, the most "advanced" reasoning model in the test, scored 1.83 close to the maximum possible. The mechanism is the unsettling part. When a single fictional candidate from one group happened to fail as a doctor, the model didn't just note that one result, it started steering future candidates from that same group toward lower-status jobs, like janitor. That's a bias forming live, from a handful of data points inside the interaction, not something inherited from the training set. It's a genuinely different failure mode than "the AI learned society's biases from the internet," and one that's much harder to audit for, because it isn't sitting in the model's weights waiting to be found, it forms fresh, in the deployment, based on whatever happens to occur. The limitation worth flagging: this was a clean simulated game with instant, unambiguous feedback. Real hiring feedback is slow, messy, and incomplete, so it's genuinely unclear how strongly this transfers to an actual applicant tracking system. But the researchers did find real fixes: bias dropped substantially when the model was given an explicit incentive structure that rewarded diverse outcomes, and when candidates came with more individual context instead of a bare pass/fail history. Practical takeaway: if AI touches your hiring process anywhere: screening, ranking, first-round questions - don't assume "we didn't feed it biased data" means you're in the clear. Ask your vendor what safeguards exist against bias that forms during use, not just bias baked in at training, and favor tools that give the model rich context on individual candidates rather than thin, outcome-only signals. Sources: - [MIT Technology Review - AI is more likely than humans to form biases when hiring](https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/07/20/1140655/ai-biases-hiring-humans/) Enhanced Relationships: The 30-Second Habit That Predicts Whether a Relationship Lasts [Enhanced Relationships: The 30-Second Habit That Predicts Whether a Relationship Lasts] Happy couples aren't necessarily the ones who fight the least. New research suggests they might just be better at pausing to notice when something good is happening. Researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign surveyed 589 U.S. adults mostly married, average age around 39 about a habit they call "joint savoring": deliberately pausing to appreciate a good moment together instead of letting it slide by. That can be as small as lingering over a good meal, reminiscing about a favorite trip, or actively looking forward to something you have planned. Using a scale adapted from established psychology research, the team found that people who reported more joint savoring with their partner also reported less conflict, more relationship satisfaction, and more confidence the relationship would last. The protective effect showed up most strongly for couples who were also dealing with higher stress in their lives exactly the couples who'd benefit most from a resilience boost. Worth being honest about the limits here: this only surveyed one partner per couple, not both, so it's one person's perception of the relationship, not a verified shared reality. The sample also skewed toward people already reporting solid relationships and relatively low stress, and toward a fairly narrow demographic (mostly white, married, middle-to-upper income). And like most relationship research, this is correlational, it can't rule out that happier couples simply savor more because they're already happier, rather than the savoring causing the happiness. Even with those caveats, it lines up with something relationship researchers keep finding from different angles: the small, repeatable rituals couples build around good moments seem to matter as much as how they handle bad ones. It costs nothing, takes seconds, and doesn't require either partner to change anything structural about the relationship. Practical takeaway: next time something good happens with your partner - a good dinner, an easy afternoon, good news - say something out loud that marks it as a moment worth remembering, instead of just moving on to the next thing. It's a small habit with a real, replicated payoff. Sources: - [ScienceDaily - Couples who savor happy moments together have stronger, longer-lasting relationships](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/02/260213223908.htm) - [Larsen, Barton & Ogolsky, "Joint Savoring in Romantic Relationships," Contemporary Family Therapy, 2025](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-025-09769-5) Enhanced Nutrition: The Daily Drink Habit Tied to 2.5x the Risk of Stomach Cancer About 65% of U.S. adults have a sugar-sweetened drink every day without thinking much about it. A new study out of Mass General Brigham gives that habit a specific number worth knowing. [Researchers pooled data from 112,284 people](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/09/260909005207.htm) across two of the longest-running health studies in the country: the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, tracking their diets and health outcomes for decades. Over that time, 278 participants developed gastric (stomach) cancer. People who drank a sugar-sweetened beverage daily had roughly 2.45 times the risk of gastric cancer compared to people who drank one less than once a month. Among women specifically, drinking more than one sugary beverage a day pushed that to a 3.04-fold higher risk. Notably, artificially sweetened diet drinks showed no similar association at all, this appears to be specifically about the sugar, not just "soda" as a category. [Enhanced Nutrition: The Daily Drink Habit Tied to 2.5x the Risk of Stomach Cancer] The study can't fully explain why, and it comes with real limitations. It's observational, so it can't prove the sugar itself is the cause rather than something correlated with heavy soda drinking. The researchers also only had H. pylori infection status - a major known risk factor for stomach cancer for a small subset of participants (940 people, about a third of whom were infected), which leaves room for that variable to be muddying the picture. The study population also skewed heavily white, so it's unclear how well this generalizes across other populations.Still, a nearly two-and-a-half-times relative risk from a single, specific, swappable habit is a strong enough signal to take seriously, especially given how cheap the fix is. Practical takeaway: if a daily soda or sweet tea is part of your routine, this is a good nudge to make it the exception rather than the default swap toward water, unsweetened, or an artificially sweetened version most days. It's one of the few cancer-risk conversations where the fix costs nothing and requires no willpower marathon, just a different can.Sources: - [ScienceDaily - Daily sugary drinks linked to sharply higher stomach cancer risk](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/09/260909005207.htm) - [Gweon, Ha, Kim, Du & Song, Gastro Hep Advances, 2026; 5(11): 101097](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastha.2026.101097) Enhanced Gear: The First Barbour Jacket That's Actually Waterproof Every Barbour jacket ever made has carried the same small asterisk: waxed cotton is water-resistant, not waterproof. It sheds light rain beautifully and looks better every year it does it but stands in a real, sustained downpour long enough and it eventually loses. The brand's new Transport Ursula is the first one built to not lose that fight at all. [Enhanced Gear: The First Barbour Jacket That's Actually Waterproof] Instead of wax, [the Ursula uses a genuine cotton-and-membrane build](https://shop.uncrate.com/products/barbour-transport-ursula-waterproof-jacket): a 100% cotton face fabric layered over a polyurethane membrane, with a 100% polyamide lining and a packable polyamide hood. That membrane is the actual engineering story, it's the same basic principle brands like Gore-Tex have used for decades to make something genuinely water-sealed rather than merely water-repellent, and it's new territory for a brand whose entire identity has been built around wax. The jacket keeps a few classically Barbour touches - a stand collar, lower bellows pockets, an angled chest pocket, a quiet checked pattern with minimal branding but the waterproofing itself is a completely different piece of engineering than what's under the hood of a classic Beaufort or Bedale. At $650, it's priced like the specialty piece it is, and it currently ships final sale, no returns, worth knowing before you order a size you're unsure about. But the honest comparison isn't to a $150 rain shell, it's to the $400-$700 range of technical outdoor jackets that actually perform in sustained wet weather, a category classic wax cotton was never built to compete in. Practical takeaway: next time you're jacket shopping and the word "waterproof" is on the label, look for the word "membrane" in the spec sheet before you believe it. A wax coating or a "water-repellent" treatment sheds a shower; a real membrane is what actually keeps you dry in a genuine storm and now, for the first time, Barbour makes one. Sources: - [Uncrate - Barbour Transport Ursula Waterproof Jacket](https://shop.uncrate.com/products/barbour-transport-ursula-waterproof-jacket) Anyway! That's all for this week. See you next week for more life-enhancing TL;DRs from across the internet. [Stephen] P.S. [New Street Fighter movie coming soon](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6sbm1OaJb8)! Is it going to win any Oscars? Unlikely. Does it look like a riot of good fun. 100%. P.P.S. Know someone who'd like this? Forward it along - sign up here. Did someone forward you this email? [You can sign-up here](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/subscribe?a=MqwnWT&g=Pgp2J4&utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Enhanced%20Newsletter%20%2321&_kx=nf3jdGxNrQgMHMWOs3OyAA.MqwnWT). Bored of hearing from me? No problem. [You can unsubscribe from the Enhanced Newsletter here](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/unsubscribe?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a6671c4d9968b0e&se=theenhancedmale%40mailspo.com&m=01M2MPXC8DG3E81TB55SQRDG7H&r=01M2PJA9G2YPZ83P8G80WK0VEW). [Shadow] This email was sent to theenhancedmale@mailspo.com by The Enhanced Male 5126 Clareton Dr Suite 120 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 You received this email because you're part of The Enhanced Male crew. We love sharing updates but if it’s not agreeing with your inbox [Unsubscribe here](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/unsubscribe?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a6671c4d9968b0e&se=theenhancedmale%40mailspo.com&m=01M2MPXC8DG3E81TB55SQRDG7H&r=01M2PJA9G2YPZ83P8G80WK0VEW). 1f:["$","article",null,{"className":"min-w-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden","aria-label":"A Relationship Tester","children":[["$","$L27",null,{"emailId":"283c4950-1e55-4fe2-bfdc-54c5328ca88d"}],["$","$L28",null,{"email":{"id":"283c4950-1e55-4fe2-bfdc-54c5328ca88d","subject":"A Relationship Tester","previewText":"Can't see this email? [Open in your browser](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/web-view?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a6671c4d9968b0e&se=theenhancedmale%40mailspo.com&m=01M2MPXC8DG3E81TB55SQRDG7H&r=01M2PJA9G2YPZ83P8G80WK0VEW)\n\nThe Enhanced Newsletter\n\n(5 things","sentAt":"2026-09-17T02:30:16.000Z","classification":"marketing","imageCount":8,"thumbnailUrl":"https://mailspo-ingest.imraan-243.workers.dev/img/inbound/img/e5ea28f0b8df7275e4c51f086ec8fec232bb8516d091729683eb8695840cd6d3","emailType":"newsletter","typeConfidence":"guess","typeBasis":"no stronger signal","brand":"$25:props:brands:1015","bodyHtml":"$29","textBody":"$2a","bodyFallback":null}}]]}] a:null f:[["$","title","0",{"children":"A Relationship Tester by The Enhanced Male | Mailspo"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"Can't see this email? [Open in your browser](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/web-view?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a667"}],["$","meta","2",{"name":"robots","content":"index, follow"}],["$","link","3",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://mailspo.com/emails/283c4950-1e55-4fe2-bfdc-54c5328ca88d"}],["$","meta","4",{"property":"og:title","content":"A Relationship Tester by The Enhanced Male | Mailspo"}],["$","meta","5",{"property":"og:description","content":"Can't see this email? [Open in your browser](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/web-view?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a667"}],["$","meta","6",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://mailspo.com/emails/283c4950-1e55-4fe2-bfdc-54c5328ca88d"}],["$","meta","7",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"Mailspo"}],["$","meta","8",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://mailspo-ingest.imraan-243.workers.dev/img/inbound/img/e5ea28f0b8df7275e4c51f086ec8fec232bb8516d091729683eb8695840cd6d3"}],["$","meta","9",{"property":"og:image:alt","content":"The Enhanced Male email creative: A Relationship Tester"}],["$","meta","10",{"property":"og:type","content":"article"}],["$","meta","11",{"property":"article:published_time","content":"2026-09-17T02:30:16.000Z"}],["$","meta","12",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","13",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"A Relationship Tester by The Enhanced Male | Mailspo"}],["$","meta","14",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"Can't see this email? [Open in your browser](https://manage.kmail-lists.com/subscriptions/web-view?a=MqwnWT&c=01KZ7X9F612B5M0C9ZV39257M1&k=bda47aca1e036b8c3a667"}],["$","meta","15",{"name":"twitter:image","content":"https://mailspo-ingest.imraan-243.workers.dev/img/inbound/img/e5ea28f0b8df7275e4c51f086ec8fec232bb8516d091729683eb8695840cd6d3"}],["$","meta","16",{"name":"twitter:image:alt","content":"The Enhanced Male email creative: A Relationship Tester"}],["$","link","17",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.ico?favicon.3lxqohtg4uvbd.ico","sizes":"48x48","type":"image/x-icon"}],["$","$L2b","18",{}]]

Search Mailspo